Here are some pictures that suck

Those are obstensibly Hamas "Freedom-Fighters" who took all those civilians to use as human shields. Hey jerks, get some uniforms and stop using the people you claim to represent as protection. Isn't it supposed to work the other way?

This next picture earns it's photographer a special place in whatever condemnation you wish to throw at them.

It's from the New York Times, and it is an Iraqi sniper shooting at American troops. How can you not distrust the old grey lady after seeing where their sympathies lie like this? Maybe I'm comming on a little strong, but doesn't it bother you a little when the paper that complains about the progress in Iraq obviously has some information they could share that would help us progress (i.e. where the sniper's group is), or better yet, stop paying them ransom for safe passage to get "great photo ops" and "exclusive interviews" like this. And, you could also stop telling them when we're comming and how we're looking for them...thanks.

I mean, it would be great if they were even just indirectly supporting the terrorists...like allowing the papers that explicitly support the fighters to get these pictures and then pay those papers for it...instead of just paying the fighter.

The place I found the picture titled the post "The Media Are the Enemy." I can't really say it any better...